The spatial dimension of decisions on land management. An analysis model
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
LECTOR INTELIGENTE (Spanish)

Keywords

decision making
land management
actor-network theory
cover change and land use
spatial analysis

How to Cite

The spatial dimension of decisions on land management. An analysis model. (2019). región Y Sociedad, 31. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2019/31/977

Abstract

In today’s debate on global environmental change and contribution of human activities as a detonator of this process, disciplinary controversies are generated. This article aims to develop an analysis model in order to integrate the spatial dimension into the study of decisions on land management, and consequently overcome constraints of studies that deal with this subject from an exclusively sociological perspective, as well as those which privilege the spatial approach. In the model, the cover change and land use analysis is combined with the actor-network theory. The result is a hybrid model that assigns the category of essential explanatory element to spatial dimension so as to understand decision making on land management. The usefulness of the model might be limited by the availability of information at detailed geographical scales; however, it provides elements for moving from the explanatory models to the transformers of socio-natural reality.
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
LECTOR INTELIGENTE (Spanish)

References

Aranda, J. M. (2004). Principales desarrollos de la sociología ambiental. Ciencia Ergo Sum, 11(2), 199-208. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10411210

Berkes, F., Colding, J., y Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de http://assets.cambridge.org/052181/5924/sample/0521815924ws.pdf

Banco Mundial. (2008). Manejo sostenible de la tierra: desafíos, posibilidades y costos de oportunidad. Colombia: Banco Mundial y Mayol Ediciones S. A. Recuperado de http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/901001468170041631/Manejo-sostenible-de-la-tierra-desafios-posibilidades-y-costos-de-oportunidad

Bourdieu, P. (1999). La miseria del mundo. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina, S. A.

Bourdieu, P., y Wacquant, L. (2005). Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.

Braceras, I. (2012). Cartografía participativa: herramienta de empoderamiento y participación por el derecho al territorio (tesis de maestría). Recuperada de https://geoactivismo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Tesina_n_2_Iratxe_Braceras.pdf

Castree, N. (2016). Geography and the new social contract for global change research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, (41), 328–347. doi: 10.1111/tran.12125

Chowdhury, R. R. (2006). Driving forces of tropical deforestation: The role of remote sensing and spatial models. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, (27), 82-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00241.x

Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO). (2018). Cambio ambiental global. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Cambio Medioambiental Global, Territorio y Políticas Ambientales. Recuperado de https://clacsoambientalglobal.wordpress.com/cambio-ambiental-global-2/

Cote, M., y Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475-489. doi: 10.1177/0309132511425708

DellaSala, D. A., Goldstein, M. I., Elias, S., Jennings, B., Lacher, T. E., Mineau, P., y Pyare. S. (2018). The anthropocene: How the great acceleration is transforming the planet at unprecedented levels. En D. A. DellaSala y M. I. Goldstein (eds.), Encyclopedia of the anthropocene (pp. 1-7). Oxford: Elsevier, Book Aid International. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09957-2

Eichholz, M., Assche, K. V., Oberkircher, L., y Hornidge, A. K. (2012). Trading capitals? Bourdieu, land and water in rural Uzbekistan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(6), 868-892. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.708650

Entwisle, B., Walsh, S. J., Rindfuss, R. R., y Chamratrithirong, A. (1998). Land-use/land-cover and population dynamics, Nang Rong, Thailand. En D. Liverman, E. F. Moran, R. R. Rindfuss y P. C. Stern (eds.), People and pixels. Linking remote sensing and social science (pp. 121-144). Washington: National Academy Press.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2016). Portal de suelos de la FAO. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/es/

Foltête, J. C., Girardet, X., y Clauzel, C. (2014). A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, (124), 140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.012

Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., y Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression. The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Newcastle: John Wiley and Sons.

Geist, H., y Lambin, E. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143-150. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2

Geoghegan, J., Cortina, S., Klepeis, P., Mendoza, P. M., Ogneva, Y., Chowdhury, R., Turner II, B. L., y

Vance, C. (2001). Modeling tropical deforestation in the Southern Yucatán peninsular region: Comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, (85), 25-46. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00201-8

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press Editorial.

Giddens, A. (2014). Sociología. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Goodman, D. (1999). Agro-food studies in the ‘age of ecology’: Nature, corporeality, bio-politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(1), 17-38. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00091

Gray, B. J., y Gibson, J. W. (2013). Actor–networks, farmer decisions, and identity. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 35(2), 82-101. doi: 10.1111/cuag.12013

Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A. … Townshend, J. R. G. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, (342), 850-853. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693

Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Zhiqiang, Y., y Krankina, O. N. (2005). Comparison of tasseled cap-based landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, (97), 301-310. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.009

Huggett, R. J. (1999). Ecosphere, biosphere, or gaia? What to call the global ecosystem. Global Ecology and Biogeography, (8), 425-431. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00158.x

Panel Intergubernamental del Cambio Climático (IPCC). (2013). Resumen para responsables de políticas. En T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G-K Plattner, M. M. B Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Yu Xia, V. Bex y P. M. Midgley (eds.), Cambio climático 2013: bases físicas. Contribución del grupo de trabajo I al Quinto Informe de Evaluación del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (pp. 3-30). Cambridge y Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_brochure_es.pdf

Panel Intergubernamental del Cambio Climático (IPCC). (2014). Technical Summary. En O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel y J. C. Minx (eds.), Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 33-108) Cambridge y Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_frontmatter.pdf

Jelinski, D. E., y Wu, J. (1996). The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11(3), 129-140. doi: 10.1007/BF02447512

Lambin E. F., Geist, H. J., y Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, (28), 205-241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459

Latour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social: una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Leichenko, R., y Eisenhauer, D. C. (2017). Global environmental change: Human dimensions. En D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, y R. A. Marston (eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography (pp. 1-11). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0649

Li, Y., Liu, G., y Huang, C. (2017). Dynamic changes analysis and hotspots detection of land use in the central core functional area of Jing-Jin-Ji from 2000 to 2015 based on remote sensing data. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, (2017), 1-16. doi: 10.1155/2017/2183585

Mariñez, F. (2005). Funcionalismo y reconfiguración social. Una revisión crítica de la sociología de Talcott Parsons. Trayectorias, (19), 32-45. Recuperado de http://trayectorias.uanl.mx/19/funcionalismo.html

Mastrangelo, A. V. (2009). Análisis del concepto de recursos naturales en dos estudios de caso en Argentina. Ambiente & Sociedad, 12(2), 341-355. doi: 10.1590/S1414-753X2009000200009

Mendiola, I. (2012). Habitando espacios socionaturales: reflexiones desde la ecología política. En F. Tirado y D. López (eds.), Teoría del actor-red. Más allá de los estudios de ciencia y tecnología (pp. 243-283). Barcelona: Amentia Editorial.

Meyer, W. B., y Turner II, B. L. (1992). Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, (23), 39-61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000351

Moreno, F. A. (1988). El lugar de lo rural. En J. Zepeda (coord.), Las sociedades rurales hoy (pp. 113-126). Zamora: El Colegio de Michoacán.

National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Advancing land change modeling: Opportunities and research requirements. Washington: The National Academies Press, National Research Council. Recuperado de http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18385

O’Brien, K. (2012a). Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 667-676. doi: 10.1177/0309132511425767

O’Brien, K. (2012b). Global environmental change III: closing the gap between knowledge and action. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 587-596. doi: 10.1177/0309132512469589

Overmars, K. P., y Verburg, P. H. (2005). Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: Linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(2), 125-152. doi: 10.1080/13658810410001713380

Pineda, N. B., Bosque, J., Gómez, M., y Franco, R. (2010). Exploring the driving forces behind deforestation in the State of Mexico (Mexico) using geographically weighted regression. Applied Geography, (30), 576-591. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.004

Polanyi, K. (2007). La gran transformación. Crítica del liberalismo económico (primera edición 1947). Argentina: Quipu Editorial.

Raedeke, A. H., y Rikoon, J. S. (1997). Temporal and spatial dimensions of knowledge: Implications for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, (14), 145-158. doi: 10.1023/A:1007346929150

Rosales, M. R. (2006). Modernidad, naturaleza y riesgo. En P. L. Sotolongo y C. J. Delgado (coords.), La revolución contemporánea del saber y la complejidad social. Hacia unas ciencias sociales de nuevo tipo (pp. 213-221). Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. Recuperado de http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/campus/soto/soto.html

Salgado, R. (2015). Agricultura sustentable y sus posibilidades en relación con consumidores urbanos. Estudios Sociales, (45), 114-140. Recuperado de https://www.ciad.mx/estudiosociales/index.php/es/article/view/184/105

Serneels, S., y Lambin, E. F. (2001). Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: A spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, (85), 65-81. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00188-8

Smelser, N., y Swedberg, R. (2005). Introducing economic sociology. En N. Smelser y R. Swedberg (eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 3-25). Nueva York: Princeton University Press.

Soares-Filho, B., Alencar, A., Nepstad, D., Cerqueira, G., Vera, M. C., Rivero, S., Solorzano, L., y Voll, E. (2004). Simulating the response of land-cover changes to road paving and governance along a major Amazon highway: The Santarém–Cuiabá corridor. Global Change Biology, (10), 745-764. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00769.x

Valembois, V. (1981). El binomio hombre-naturaleza en el indio mesoamericano. Revista de Filosofía, (49-50), 115-120. Recuperado de http://www.inif.ucr.ac.cr/recursos/docs/Revista%20de%20Filosof%C3%ADa%20UCR/Vol.%20XIX/49-50/El%20binomio%20Hombre-Naturaleza%20en%20el%20indio%20mesoamericano.pdf

Vance, C., y Geoghegan, J. (2002). Temporal and spatial modelling of tropical deforestation: A survival analysis linking satellite and household survey data. Agricultural Economics, (27), 317-332. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5150(02)00074-9

Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. doi: 10.1177/0963662509102694

Williams, D. R., y Patterson, M. E. (1996). Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: Perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography. Society & Natural Resources, 9(5), 507-521. doi: 10.1080/08941929609380990

Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopin, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., y Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, (16), 304-316. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004

Zhou, P., Huang, J., Pontius Jr., R. G., y Hong, H. (2014). Land classification and change intensity analysis in a coastal eatershed of Southeast China. Sensors, (14), 11640-11658. doi: 10.3390/s140711640

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Araceli del Carmen Andablo Reyes, María del Carmen Hernández Moreno, Jean Francois Mas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.