Restricciones de liquidez en microempresas y la importancia del financiamiento informal en Baja California
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

microenterprises
liquidity constraints
finance
informality
microfinance
social networks

How to Cite

Restricciones de liquidez en microempresas y la importancia del financiamiento informal en Baja California. (2009). región Y Sociedad, 21(44). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2009.44.a456

Abstract

The industrial structure of Mexico includes a significant share of agents running low-scale, informal enterprises. This constitutes a serious obstacle to obtaining funding in formal financial markets; consequently these entrepreneurs face a permanent liquidity constraint. This article tests the hypothesis that despite this formal liquidity constraint some informal microenterprises are unconstrained of financial resources. The results suggest this possibility by finding unconstrained microenterprises in Baja California, implying the presence of external sources of funding and illustrating the importance of informal finance to these enterprises.

PDF (Spanish)

References

Aguilar, José G., N. Ramírez y K. Barrón. 2007. Conformación de la microempresa marginada en la frontera norte de México. Estudios Fronterizos VIII (15): 51–71.

Berger, Marguerite S. 1997. Microenterprise Development Strategy. Washington: BID.

Blanchflower, D. y A. Oswald. 1998. What makes an Entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics I (1): 26–60.

Carpintero, S. 1998. Los programas de apoyo a la microempresa en América Latina. Bilbao: Ediciones Deusto.

Castillo, R. 2001. ¿La sensibilidad de la inversión con respecto al flujo de caja indica acertadamente la existencia y magnitud de las restricciones de liquidez? Gaceta de Economía (14), año 7.

Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL). 1992. Equidad y transformación productiva: un enfoque integrado. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Daniels, L. 2007. Small Enterprises in Africa: Microfinance, the Legal Environment, and Contributions to Income. Paper presented in the 1 st. International Conference Economics and Politics: Perspectives on Development, UABC, Tijuana.

Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2002. Ley para el Desarrollo de la Competitividad de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa. México. 30 de diciembre.

Dunn, T. y D. Holtz–Eakin. 2000. Financial Capital, Human Capital, and the Transition to Self–employment: Evidence from Intergenerational Links. Journal of Labor Economics XVIII (2): 282–305.

Evans, D. y B. Jovanovic. 1989. An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints. Journal of Political Economy XCVII (4): 808–827.

–––––––––– y L. Leighton. 1989. Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review LXXIX (3): 519–535.

Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard y B. Petersen. 1987. Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working papers series no. 2387. http://www.nber.org/papers/w2387.pdf?new_window=1 (2 de octubre de 2008).

Georgellis, Y., J. G. Sessions y N. Tsitsianis. 2005. Self–employment Longitudinal Dynamics: A Review of the Literature. Economic Issues X (2): 51–84.

Guilli, H. 1999. Microfinanzas y pobreza: ¿son válidas las ideas preconcebidas? Nueva York: BID.

Hernández–Trillo, F., J. Pagan y J. Paxton. 2005. Start–up Capital, Microenterprises and Technical Efficiency in Mexico. Review of Development Economics IX (3): 434–447.

Holtz–Eakin, D., D. Joulfaian y H. Rosen. 1994. Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints. The Journal of Political Economy CII (1): 53–75.

–––––––––– 1994. Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity Constraints. The RAND Journal of Economics XXV (2): 334–347.

INEGI. 2004. Censos económicos 2004. Aguascalientes: INEGI.

–––––––––– 2002. Encuesta nacional de micronegocios 2002. Aguascalientes: INEGI.

Johansson, E. 2000. Self–employment and Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Economics CII (1): 123–134.

Kantis, H., I. Masahiko y M. Komori. 2002. Empresarialidad en economías emergentes: creación y desarrollo de nuevas empresas en América Latina y el este de Asia: resumen. Washington: BID.

Kaplan, S. y L. Zingales. 1997. Do Investment–cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financial Constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics CVII: 169–215.

Liedholm, C. 2002. Small Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Africa and Latin America. Small Business Economics (18): 227–242.

Mead, D. M., y C. Liedholm. 1998. The Dynamics of Micro and Small Enterprises in Developing Countries. World Development 26 (1): 61–74.

Mungaray A., M. Ramírez–Urquidy, M. Texis, D. Ledezma y N. Ramírez–Ángulo. 2007. Promoting Learning in Small Entrepreneurs and Higher Education Students through Service Learning Programs. International Journal of Business Research VII (3): 10–28.

––––––––––, N. Ramírez y M. Texis Flores. 2005. Estructura de mercado y maximización de beneficios en las microempresas. Comercio Exterior 55 (4): 316–321.

–––––––––– y M. Ramírez–Urquidy. 2005. Production Efficiency and Credit Availability for Micro and Small Firms in Baja California. En Industrial Development and Labor Markets in the United States–Mexico Border, editado por A. Mungaray, S. Lugo y N. Fuentes, 129–156. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Ángeles.

Nabi, Ijaz. 1989. Investment in Segmented Capital Markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics (104): 453–62.

Perry, Guillermo E., William F. Maloney, Omar S. Arias, Pablo Fajnzylber, Andrew D. Mason y Jaime Saavedra–Chanduvi. 2007. Informalidad: escape y exclusión. Washington: Banco Mundial.

Petersen, B. C., R. G. Hubbard y S. M. Fazzari. 1996. Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment: Response to Kaplan and Zingales. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper series, no. W5462. http://ssrn.com/abstract=7506 (2 de octubre de 2008).

Ruiz, C. 1995. Economía de la pequeña empresa. México: Ariel.

Taylor, M. 2001. Self–employment and Windfall Gains in Britain: Evidence from Panel Data. Económica LXVII (272): 539–565.

Tybout, James. 1983. Credit Rationing and Investment Behavior in a Developing Country. Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (4): 598–607.

Open access policy

The authors who publish in región y sociedad accept the following conditions:

In accordance with the copyright laws, región y sociedad recognizes and respects the authors’ moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to the journal to disseminate the articles in open access. región y sociedad does not charge the authors for submitting and processing articles for publication.

All the texts published by región y sociedad —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons license 4.0 Attribution – Noncommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 International), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as they mention the works’ authorship and the first publication in this journal.

The authors can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in región y sociedad (for instance include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in región y sociedad.

For all the above, the author(s) must send the Letter of transfer of property rights of the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This letter can be sent by e-mail as a PDF to: region@colson.edu.mx

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.