Expected effects of shale gas extraction in northeastern Mexico: a qualitative approach
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
Lector Inteligente (Spanish)

Keywords

impact assessment
public opinion
hydraulic fracturing
gas supply
integrated relevant criteria
northeastern Mexico

How to Cite

Morales Ramírez, D., & Roux, R. (2018). Expected effects of shale gas extraction in northeastern Mexico: a qualitative approach. región y sociedad, 30(72). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2018.72.a378

Abstract

This article identifies and assesses the expected effects of shale gas extraction in Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon and Coa­huila in the face of the imminent arrival of new companies to Burgos Basin in northeastern Mexico. Using the inte­grated relevant criteria methodology, data of key informants from the academic, governmental and business sectors in the three states were collected. According to the results, 65 percent of the variables used for assessing these effects, as a consequence of the development of industry in the region, are associated with positive changes, 15 percent with nega­tive changes and 20 percent remain unchanged. Expected benefits from shale gas/oil exploitation were overestimated; moreover, there is concern about the availability of water, given the geographical and climatological conditions of the region. Although the methodology used does not specify it must be applied to an optimal number of actors, it is to be admitted that the analysis could be significantly improved the greater the number of participants is. The main con­tribution to the field of assessment of social repercussions is that of having adapted this methodology because of the existing scarce literature on the subject.

PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)
Lector Inteligente (Spanish)

References

Asamblea contra la Fractura Hidráulica. 2011. La extracción de gas no convencional y la fractura hidráulica permisos en Burgos. http://www.comimsa.com.mx/ (5 de junio de 2015).

Barbosa, Fabio. 2014. ¿Podemos obtener lecciones de la cuenca Marcellus? http://contralinea.info/archivo-revista/index.php/2014/02/16/podemos-obtener-lecciones-de-la-cuenca-marcellus/ (7 de junio de 2015).

Barrueta, Eduardo. 2015. Gas de lutitas en la cuenca de Burgos. Energía y Debate. http://energiaadebate.com/gas-de-lutitas-en-la-cuenca-de-burgos/ (7 de junio de 2015).

Burdge, R, J. y F. Vanclay. 1996. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Social Impact Assessment 14: 59-86.

Buroz, Eduardo. 1994. Métodos de evaluación de impactos. En II Curso de postgrado sobre Evaluación de Impactos Ambientales. Foro Latinoamericano de Ciencias Ambientales, La Plata.

Brown, Ralph, Shawn Dorius y Richard Krannich. 2005. The boom-bust-recovery cycle: dynamics of change in commu¬nity satisfaction and social integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology 70: 28-49.

Centro de Investigaciones Sociales. 2015. Reporte de diagnóstico general social, página 141. / http://www.impactosshalenoreste.uat.edu.mx/Documents/II.%20DIAGNÓSTICO-GENERAL-SOCIAL.pdf (31 de enero de 2018).

Comisión Nacional del Agua. 2014. Estadísticas del agua en México, edición 2014. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México.

Correa Restrepo, Francisco, Andrés Vasco Ramírez y Catalina Pérez Montoya. 2005. La curva medioambiental de Kuznets: evidencia empírica para Colombia. Semestre Económico 8 (15): 13-30. http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1104/1075 (16 de marzo de 2017).

Davidson, Dona. 1979. Overview of the boomtown phenomenon and its effect on women and minorities. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Energy Resource Development Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

DOF. 2014. Ley de Hidrocarburos. 11 de agosto.

Ecosystem Research Group. 2008. Sublette county socioeconomic impact study Sublette county, Wyo¬ming. http://sublette-se.org/files/SubletteProfile11Feb08.pdf (17 de marzo de 2017).

Energy International Administration. 2013. EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment. http://www.adv-res.com/pdf/A_EIA_ARI_2013%20World%20Shale%20Gas%20and%20Shale%20Oil%20Resource%20Assessment.pdf (1 de junio de 2015).

Flores, Daniel. 2014. Comentarios sobre la reforma energética. Boletín mensual del Centro de Investigaciones Económicas. Facultad de Economía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.

FAO. 1995. Impacto ambiental de las prácticas de cosecha forestal y construcción de caminos en bosques nativos siempre verdes de la X Región de Chile. Estudio monográfico. http://www.fao.org/docrep/V9727S/V9727S00.htm (4 de diciembre de 2015).

Food and Water Watch. 2013. The social cost of fracking: a Pennsyilvania case study. https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/reports/the-social-costs-of-fracking/ (5 de junio de 2015).

The Wall Street Journal. 2008. Gas producers rush to Pennsylvania: promising results there spur investment. 2 de abril. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120709326316581793 (16 de marzo de 2017).

Horton, Paul y Gerald Leslie. 1955. The sociology of social problems. Nueva York: Appiclon-Century-Cropts.

Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. 1995. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Review 15: 1 I-43.

Jacquet, Jeffrey. 2009. Energy boomtowns and natural gas: implications for Marcellus shale local governments and rural communities. Paper 43. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, Pennstate. http://nercrd.psu.edu/Publications/rdppapers/rdp43.pdf (1 de mayo de 2015).

Jacobsen, Grant y Dominic Parker. 2014. The economic aftermath of resource booms: evidence from boomtowns in the American west. The Economic Journal 126: 1092-1128. Doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12173

Kohrs, Eldean. 1974. Social consequences of boom growth in Wyoming. Ponencia presentada en Rocky Mountain American Association of the Advancement of Science Meeting, Laramie, Wyoming. http://www.sublettewyo.com/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/97 (1 de mayo de 2015).

MacPherson, Matthew. 2004. Guía para la realización de las evaluaciones de impacto social dentro del proceso de evaluación de impacto ambiental. Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. http://www.ambiente.gob.do/Transparencia/Legal/Guia/Guia-para-realizacion-Evaluaciones-Impacto-Social.pdf (3 de mayo de 2015).

Muller, Richard y Elizabeth Muller. 2013. Why every serious environmentalist should favour fracking. Centre for Policy Studies. http://www.cps.org.uk/files/reports/original/131202135150-WhyEverySeriousEnvironmentalistShouldFavourFracking.pdf (12 de marzo de 2017).

Schafft, Kai A., Borlu Yetkin y Glenna Leland. 2013. The relationship between Marcellus shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity. Rural Sociology 78: 143-66.

Secretaría de Energía. 2014. Prospectiva del gas natural y gas LP 2014-2028. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/352/Prospectiva-GasNaturalGasLP-2014.pdf (16 de mayo de 2016).

SEMARNAT. 2008. Ordenamiento ecológico: región cuenca de Burgos. México. http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/archivosanteriores/temas/ordenamientoecologico/Documents/documentos_burgos/zip/resumen_ejecutivo_mar_08_2.pdf (20 de julio de 2015).

Suárez, Francisco M. 1989. Problemas sociales y problemas de programas sociales masivos. Trabajo presentado en el Seminario sobre programas sociales masivos, organizado por el Centro Interamericano para el Desarrollo. Social/Organización de Estados Americanos y el Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social, San José, Costa Rica. http://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/1989/S8900328.pdf (20 de julio de 2015).

Theodori, Gene. 2012. Public perception of the natural gas industry: data from the Barnett Shale. Energy Sources, part B 7: 275-281.

Theodori, Gene y Douglas Jackson-Smith. 2010. Public perception of the oil and gas industry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Ponencia presentada en la Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florencia.

Vanclay, Frank. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 21 (1): 5-11. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491

Vanclay, Frank. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22 (3): 183–211.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Dionicio Morales Ramírez, Ruth Roux

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.