Keywords
transborder planning
transborder cooperation
planning regimes
Mexico-United States relations
transborder space
collaborative planning
transborder cooperation
planning regimes
Mexico-United States relations
transborder space
collaborative planning
How to Cite
Peña Medina, S. (2011). Regímenes de planificación transfronteriza: México-Estados Unidos. región y sociedad, 23(50). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2011.50.a26
Abstract
This article offers a theoretical conceptual framework for studying transborder planning on the US.-México border from a regime perspective. Three types of regimes are identified: those focused on the management of shared natural resources, others focused on the supply of public goods, and risk management regimes. The central argument revolves around the ability of both countries to develop an institutional capacity for transborder planning. The article studies the way planning practices, actors, and the agenda have evolved to bring about transborder planning regimes which operate simultaneously.
References
Alegría Olazábal, Tito. 2008. ¿Existen las metrópolis transfronterizas? El caso de Tijuana–San Diego. En Ciudades en la frontera: aproximaciones críticas a los complejos urbanos transfronterizos, compilado por Haroldo Dilla, 127–166. Santo Domingo: Editorial Manatí.
––––––––––. 2000.Transmigrants, the NAFTA, and a Proposal to Protect Air Quality on the Border. En Shared Space: Rethinking the U.S.–Mexico Border Environment, compilado por Lawrence Herzog, 337–360. San Diego: Universidad de California en San Diego (UCSD), Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies.
–––––––––––. 1992. Desarrollo urbano en la frontera México–Estados Unidos: una interpretación y algunos resultados. México: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes.
Anderson, Malcom. 1996. Introduction. En Frontiers:Territory and State Formation in the Modern World, compilado por ídem., 1–11. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation:Agent–based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
–––––––––––. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society:Towards a New Modernity. Los Angeles: Sage.
Blanco, Hilda. 1994. How to Think About Social Problems:American Pragmatism and the Idea of Planning. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Blatter, Joachim y Clemens Norris. 2000. Cross–border Cooperation in Europe: Historical Development, Institutionalization, and Contrasts with North America. Journal of Borderlands Studies 1: 15–54.
Brenner, Neil. 1999. Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Rescaling of Urban Governance in the European Unión. Urban Studies 36 (3): 431–451.
–––––––––––. 1998. Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy 5 (1): 1–37.
Brunet–Jailly, Emmanuel. 2004.Towards a Model of Border Studies: What do we Learn from the Study of the Canadian–American Border. Journal of Borderlands Studies 19: 1–12.
Browning–Aiken, Ann, Holly Richter, David Goodrich, Bob Strain y Robert Varady 2004. Upper San Pedro Basin: Fostering Collaborative Binational Watershed Management. Water Resources Development 20 (3): 353–367.
Castells, Manuel. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Cortez Lara, Alfonso, Scott Witheford y Manuel Chávez Márquez. 2005. Seguridad, agua y desarrollo: el futuro de la frontera México–Estados Unidos. Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte y Michigan State University
Cruz Piñeiro, Rodolfo. 1990. Mercados de trabajo y migración en la frontera norte de México: Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, Nuevo Laredo. Frontera Norte 2: 61–94.
Elkins, David J. 1995. Beyond Sovereignty:Territoriality and Political Economy in the Twenty–first Century.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
–––––––––––. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Friedmann, John. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Glickman, Theodore y Michael Gough. 1990. Readings in Risk. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Graham, Stephen y Patsy Healey. 1999. Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice. European Planning Studies 7 (5): 623–646.
Guhathakurta, Shubrajit, David Pijawka y S. Ashur. 2000. Planning for Hazardous Mitigation in the U.S.–México Border Region: An Assessment of Hazardous Waste Generation Rates for Transportation. Frontera Norte 2: 75–290.
Guillen, Tonatiuh. 1992. La marginalidad social en la frontera norte: discrepancias empíricas al concepto de marginalidad. Frontera Norte 4 (8): 149–164.
–––––––––– 1990. Servicios públicos y marginalidad social en la frontera norte. Frontera Norte 2 (4): 95–119.
Hardin, Garret. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.
Harvey, David. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism:Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Nueva York: Verso.
––––––––––. 1990. Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination. Annals of the Asociation of American Geographers 80 (3): 418–434.
Healy, Patsy. 2006. Colaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Nueva York: Palgrave McMillan Press.
Herzog, Lawrence. 2000. Shared Space: Rethinking the U.S.–Mexico Border Environment. San Diego: University of California Press.
––––––––––. 1990. Where North Meets South: Cities, Space, and Politics on the U.S.–Mexico Border. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
Holcombe, Randall. 1996. Public Finance: Government Revenue and Expenditures in the United States Economy. Saint Paul: West Publishing Co.
Ingram, Helen, Nancy K. Laney y David Gillilan. 1995. Divided Waters: Bridging the U.S.–Mexico Border. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Innes, Judith y David E. Booher. 1999. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 412–423.
Karns, Margaret y Karen Mingst. 2004. International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Lara, Francisco. 2000.Transboundary Networks for Environmental Management in the San Diego–Tijuana Border Region. En Shared Space: Rethinking the U.S.–Mexico Border Environment, compilado por Lawrence Herzog, 155–184. San Diego: UCSD Press.
Levy, Mark, Oran Young y Michael Zurn. 1995. The Study of International Regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1 (3): 267–330.
Ley García, Judith. 2006. Amplificación e invisibilidad del riesgo. Ciudades 69: 25–31.
Lorey, David. 1990. United States–Mexico Border Statistics since 1900. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, Latin American Center Publications.
Martínez, Óscar. 1998. Border People: Life and Society in the U.S.–Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
McCormick, John. 2005. Understanding the European Unión:A Concise Introduction. Nueva York: Palgrave McMillan Press.
Michel, Suzanne. 2003.The U.S.–Mexican Border Environment: Binational Water Management Planning. En SCERP Monograph Series 8, compilado por ídem. San Diego: San Diego State University.
Morehouse, Barbara. 2004.Theoretical Approaches to Border Spaces and Identities. En Challenged Borderlands:Transcending Political and Cultural Boundaries, compilado por ídem., Vera Pavlakovich–Kochi y Doris Wastl–Walter, 19–39. Londres: Ashgate.
––––––––––. 1995. A Functional Approach to Boundaries in the Context of Environmental Issues. Journal of Borderland Studies 10 (2): 53–73.
Mumme, Steve. 1986. Engineering Diplomacy:The Evolving Role of the International Boundary and Water Commission in US.–México Water Management. Journal of Borderlands Studies 1 (1): 73–108.
–––––––––– y Christopher Brown. 2000. Decentralizing Water Policy on the US.–México Border. En Protecting a Sacred Gift: Change in Water Management in México, compilado por Steve Whiteford, 231–252. San Diego: Center for US.–México Studies.
Mumme, Steve y Terry Sprouse. 1999. Beyond BECC: Envisioning Needed Institutional Reforms for Environmental Protection on the Mexico–U.S. Border. En Handbook of Global Environmental Policy and Administration, compilado por Dennis Soden y Brent Steel, 759–778. Nueva York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neumayer, Eric. 2001. How RegimeTheory and the Economic Theory of International Environment Cooperation can Learn From Each Other? Global Environmental Politics 1 (1): 122–147.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
––––––––––. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peña, Sergio. 2007. Cross–border Planning at the U.S.–México Border: An Institutional Approach. Journal of Borderlands Studies 21 (2): 1–18.
––––––––––. 2005. Recent Developments in Urban Marginality Along México's Northern Border. Habitat International Journal 29 (2): 285–301.
––––––––––. 2004. Planificación transfronteriza: instituciones binacionales y bilaterales en la frontera México–Estados Unidos. En Gobernabilidad e ingobernabilidad en la región Paso del Norte: reflexión desde distintas perspectivas, compilado por Socorro Tabuenca y L. Antonio Payan, 59–84. Ciudad Juárez: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, New México State University, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez y NEON.
––––––––––. 2002. Land Use Planning on the USA–Mexico Border: A Comparison of the Legal Framework. Journal of Borderland Studies 17 (I): 1–19.
Pick, James y E. W Butler. 1990. Socioeconomic Inequality in the U.S.–México Borderlands. Frontera Norte 2 (3): 31–62.
Sánchez, Roberto. 1990. Manejo trasfronterizo de residuos tóxicos y peligrosos: una amenaza para los países del tercer mundo. Frontera Norte 2 (3): 391–114.
Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Savas, Emanuel. 2000. Privatization and Public Private Partnerships. Nueva York: Chatham House Publisher.
Shrivastava, Paúl. 1995. Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 118–137.
Soja, Edward. 2003.Writing the City Spatially. City 7 (3): 269–280.
––––––––––. 1999. In Different Spaces:The Cultural Turn in Urban and Regional Political Economy. European Planning Studies 7 (1): 65–75.
––––––––––. 1995. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Nueva York: Verso.
Spalding, Mark. 2000.The NAFTA Environmental Institutions and Sustainable Development on the U.S.–México Border. En Shared Space: Rethinking the U.S.–México Border Environment, compilado por Lawrence Herzog, 75–100. San Diego: UCSD Press.
Staudt, Kathy e Irasema Coronado. 2002. Fronteras No Más:Toward Social Justice at the U.S.–México Border. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 1997. Neither Global nor Local: "Glocalization" and the Politics of Scale. En Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, compilado por Kevin Cox, 197–166. Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
Vázquez Castillo,Teresa. 2001. Bilateral Planning Mexico–U.S.: Institutions, Planners and Communities. European Planning Studies 9 (5): 649–662.
Verduzco Chávez, Basilio. 2001. Civil Society and the Definition of Regions in Environmental Policy. En Cooperation, Environment, and Sustainability in Border Regions, compilado por Paul Ganster, 91–102. San Diego: San Diego State University Press.
Weintraub, Sidney. 1990. A Marriage of Convenience: Relations Between México and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, Peyton. 1994. Equity in Theory and Practice. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Young, Oran. 1999. Governance in World Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Open access policy
The authors who publish in región y sociedad accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the copyright laws, región y sociedad recognizes and respects the authors’ moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to the journal to disseminate the articles in open access. región y sociedad does not charge the authors for submitting and processing articles for publication.
All the texts published by región y sociedad —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons license 4.0 Attribution – Noncommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 International), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as they mention the works’ authorship and the first publication in this journal.
The authors can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in región y sociedad (for instance include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in región y sociedad.
For all the above, the author(s) must send the Letter of transfer of property rights of the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This letter can be sent by e-mail as a PDF to: region@colson.edu.mx
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
