The Relationship between Urban Marginality and the Digital Divide. The Case of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México, 2020
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

urban marginality
digital divide
spatial regression
Ciudad Juárez

How to Cite

The Relationship between Urban Marginality and the Digital Divide. The Case of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México, 2020. (2024). región Y Sociedad, 36, e1871. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2024/36/1871

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the relationship between urban marginalization and the digital divide in Ciudad Juárez, México. Methodology: An urban marginality index was constructed using the principal components technique. Also, eight ordinary least squares regression models and a spatial lag were estimated. The 2020 census information was used as well as the 2020 National Housing Inventory produced by the National Institute of Statistic and Geography. Results: The analysis identifies that the relationship between urban marginalization is positive and significant with respect to the digital divide, mainly for the percentage of homes that do not have mobile phones and internet. Value: This study empirically contributes to understanding how the absence of the internet and electronic devices is still linked to and affects marginal areas, especially in a border context characterized by the emergence of marginal areas in the city. Limitations: The analysis only focuses on explaining the effects for the case of Ciudad Juarez, leaving aside other cities on the U.S.-Mexico border. And it only takes up a first debate on the digital divide that addresses the availability of technology. Conclusions: The results show that for people living in marginal areas, the absence of technology can exacerbate their condition in the city.

PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

References

Alegría, T., y Ordóñez, G. (2005). Legalizando la ciudad: asentamientos informales y procesos de regularización en Tijuana. Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Santa Barbara: Springer Science & Business Media.

Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x

Buys, P., Dasgupta, S., Thomas, T. S., y Wheeler, D. (2009). Determinants of a digital divide in Sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial econometric analysis of cell phone coverage. World Development, 37(9), 1494-1505. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.01.011

Can, A. (1990). The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography, 66(3), 254-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/143400

Can, A. (1992). Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(3), 453-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90039-4

Castells, M. (2000). La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura (Vol. I). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Castells, M. (2001a). La galaxia internet: reflexiones sobre internet, empresa y sociedad. Madrid: Areté.

Castells, M. (2001b). La era de la información economía, sociedad y cultura (Vol. III). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Chakraborty, J., y Bosman, M. M. (2005). Measuring the digital divide in the United States: Race, income, and personal computer ownership. The Professional Geographer, 57(3), 395-410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00486.x

Dijk, J. A. G. M. van (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812

Dijk, J. A. G. M. van (2017). Digital divide: Impact of access. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043

DiMaggio, P., y Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Working Papers 47, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Recuperado de https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cpanda:15

Dubin, R. A. (1988). Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 466-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926785

Dubin, R. A. (1998). Spatial autocorrelation: A primer. Journal of Housing Economics, 7(4), 304-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jhec.1998.0236

Fuentes, C., y Cervera, L. (2006). Land markets and its effects on the spatial segregation; the case of Ciudad Juárez. Estudios Fronterizos, 7(13), 43-62. Recuperado de https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/estfro/v7n13/v7n13a3.pdf

Fuentes, C., y Peña, S. (2010). Globalization, transborder networks and US-Mexico border cities. En K. Staudt., C. Fuentes y J. Monárrez (eds.), Cities and citizenship at the US-Mexico border: El Paso del Norte metropolitan region (pp. 1-19). Nueva York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Graham, S. (2002). Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarisation and information and communications technologies (ICTs). Urban Studies, 39(1), 33-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220099050

Graham, S., y Marvin, S. (1996). Telecomunications and the city. Electronics spaces, urban places. Nueva York: Routledge.

Graham, S., y Marvin, S. (2001). Splinter urbanism. Networked infrastructures. Londres: Routledge.

Instituto Municipal de Investigación y Planeación. (2010). Plan de Desarrollo Urbano 2010. Ayuntamiento de Ciudad Juárez.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2020). Características del entorno urbano 2020. INEGI. Recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ccpv/2020/microdatos/ceu/Censo2020_CEU_chh_csv.zip

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2021). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. INEGI. Recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ccpv/2020/datosabiertos/ageb_manzana/ageb_mza_urbana_08_cpv2020_csv.zip

Lezama, J. L. (2002). Teoría social, espacio y ciudad. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.

López, P., y Fachelli, S. (2016). Análisis factorial. En P. López, y S. Fachelli, Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa (pp. 1-177). Barcelona: Dipòsit Digital de Documents, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

López, J., y Peña, S. (2017). La segregación socioespacial en Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua 1990-2010. región y sociedad, 68, 115-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2017.68.a210

Martínez, Y. (2020). Brecha digital en entornos de marginalidad urbana en la ciudad de Tijuana, Baja California, 2010. (Tesis de Maestría en Desarrollo Regional). El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.

Pick, J., Nishida, T., y Zhang, X. (2013). Determinants of China’s technology availability and utilization 2006-2009: A spatial analysis. The Information Society, 29(1), 26-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.739266

Pick, J. B., Sarkar, A., y Johnson, J. (2015). United States digital divide: State level analysis of spatial clustering and multivariate determinants of ICT utilization. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 49, 16-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2014.09.001

Sabatini, F. (1981). La dimensión ambiental de la pobreza urbana en las teorías latinoamericanas de marginalidad. EURE-Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 8(23), 53-67. Recuperado de https://www.eure.cl/index.php/eure/article/view/932/45

Sarkar, A., Pick, J. B., y Rosales, J. (2023). Multivariate and geospatial analysis of technology utilization in US counties. Telecommunications Policy, 47(7), 102572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102572

Sassen, S. (2007). Una sociología de la globalización. Buenos Aires: Editorial Katz.

Speak, S., y Graham, S. (1999). Service not included: private services restructurings neighbourhoods, and social marginalisation. Environment and Planning A, 31(11), 1985-2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a311985

Srnicek, N. (2019). Capitalismo de plataformas. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra.

Toudert, D. (2013). La brecha digital en los contextos de marginación socioterritorial en localidades mexicanas: exploración y discusión. Comunicación y Sociedad (19), 153-180. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34625579007

Toudert, D. (2016). Aislamiento geográfico y disponibilidad de la internet en las escuelas mexicanas. Nova Scientia, 8(17). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21640/ns.v8i17.557

Toudert, D. (2022). Brecha digital y contextos de marginación en México: una década de evolución. Cuadernos.info, (53), 318-337. doi: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.53.37763

Wacquant, L. (2007a). Los condenados en la ciudad. Gueto, periferias y Estado. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Wacquant, L. (2007b). Parias urbanos: marginalidad en la ciudad a comienzos del milenio. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neoliberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic & Racial Studies Review, 37(10), 1686-1711. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.931996

Zukin, S. (2020). Seeing like a city: How tech became urban. Theory and Society, 49(5-6), 941-964. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09410-4

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Yesua Martínez-Torres, César Mario Fuentes-Flores

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.