Keywords
gender discrimination
First national survey on discrimination in Mexico
generalized linear model
inverse Gaussian
First national survey on discrimination in Mexico
generalized linear model
inverse Gaussian
How to Cite
Argaez, J. J. (2011). Características individuales y actitudes discriminatorias hacia la mujer en México: ¿existen diferencias entre las regiones?. región y sociedad, 23(52). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2011.52.a174
Abstract
Based on the results of the first national survey on discrimination in Mexico, this study empirically evaluates the influence of individual characteristics on discriminatory attitudes towards women in Mexico. The goal is to evaluate this influence at the individual level and discover if there is a significant difference between regions that leads to the persistence of such discriminatory attitudes. The results reveal that the populations in the northern and central regions of Mexico hold more intense discriminatory attitudes than those in the South.
References
Actis, E., y A. Atucha 2003. Brechas salariales: discriminación o diferencias de productividad. Momento Económico 126: 23-33.
Anderson, J., y D. Dimon. 1999. Formal Sector Job Growth and Women's Labor Sector Participation. The Case of Mexico. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39: 169-191.
De la O, María E. 2004. Women in the Maquiladora Industry:Toward Understanding Gender and Regional Dynamics in Mexico. En The Social Costs of Industrial Growth on Northern Mexico, editado por Ka-thryn Kopinak, 65-95. La Jolla, California: Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California en San Diego.
Escamilla, Irma y Clemencia Santos. 2003. El mercado laboral en México desde la perspectiva de la geografía de género, http://www.observatoriogeograficoamericalatina.org.mx/egal9/Geografiasocioeconomica/Geografiacultural/05.pdf (31 de mayo de 2011).
Fan, P., y M. Marini. 2000. Influences of Gender-role Attitudes During the Transition to Adulthood. Social Science Research 29: 258-283.
Friedman, Carly K., Campbell Leaper y Rebecca Bigler. 2007. Do Mothers' Gender-related Attitudes and Comments Predict Young Children's Gender Beliefs? Parenting Science and Practice 7 (4): 357-366.
Galss, J. 1992. Housewives and Employed Wives: Demographic and Attitudinal Change, 1972-1986. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 559-569.
García, Brígida y Orlandina de Oliveira. 2000. La dinámica familiar en la Ciudad de México y Monterrey. En Informe final del proyecto Trabajo, familia y empoderamiento de las mujeres en México. México: El Colegio de México.
----------, M. Blanco y E. Pacheco. 1999. Género y trabajo extra-doméstico. En Mujer, género y población en México, coordinado por B. García. México: El Colegio de México.
García, C, y T Rendón. 2004. El empleo femenino en México y en España: un análisis comparativo de sus características actuales. Revista de Economía Mundial 10 (1): 23-57.
Gong, X., y A. VanSoest. 2002. Family Structure and Female Labor Supply in Mexico City. The Journal of Human Resources 37 (1): 163-191.
González Marín, María Luisa (coordinadora). 1998. Los mercados de trabajo femeninos. Tendencias recientes. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
INEGI. 2005. Encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo trimestral. Comparativos del 1er. trimestre de 2005. www.inegi.org.mex
Hanson-Frieze, I., A. Ferligoj, T. Kogovsek, T. Rener, J. Hovart y N. Sarlija. 2003. Gender Role Attitudes in University Students in the United States, Slovenia, and Croatia. Psychology of Women Quarterly 27: 256-261.
Hardin, J., y J. Hubert. 2007. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. College Station,Texas: Stata Press.
Huber, J., y G. Spitze. 1981 .Wives' Employment, Household Behaviors, and Sex-role Attitudes. Social Forces 60: 150-169.
Kaufman, G. 2005. Gender Role Attitudes and College Student's Work and Family Expectations. Gender Issues 22 (2): 58-71.
Liao,Tim y Cai Yang. 1995. Socialization, Life Situations, and Gender-role Attitudes Regarding the Family Among White American Women. Sociological Perspectives 38 (2): 241-260.
Martínez, I., y E. Acevedo. 2004. La brecha salarial en México con enfoque de género: capital humano, discriminación y selección muestral. Ciencia UANL 7(1): 66-71.
Mason, K., y Y. Lu. 1988. Attitudes Toward Women's Traditional Roles: Changes in the United States, 1977-1985. Gender and Society 2 (1): 39-57.
----------, J. L. Czajka y S. Arber. 1976. Change in the U.S. Women's Sex Role Attitudes, 1964-1974. American Sociological Review 41: 573-596.
Misra, R., y B. Panigrahi. 1996. Effects of Age on Attitudes Toward Working Women. International Journal of Manpower 17 (2): 3-17.
Moran, J. L., P. J. Solomon, A. R. Peisach y J. Martin. 2007. New Models for Old Questions: Generalized Linear Models for Costs Predictions. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13: 381-389.
Morgan, C, y S. Walker. 1983. Predicting Sex Role Attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly 46: 148-151.
Powers, R., J. Suitor, S. Guerra, M. Shackelford, D. Mecom y K. Gusman. 2003. Regional Differences in Gender-role Attitudes: Variations by Gender and Race. Gender Issues 21 (2): 40-54.
SEDESOL. 2005. Primera encuesta nacional sobre discriminación en México. Base de datos y metodología disponibles en http://sedesol2006.sedesol.gob.mx/subsecretarias/prospectiva/subse_discriminacion.htm
Serret, E. 2004. Mujeres y hombres en el imaginario social. La importancia del género en las identidades. En Mujeres y sociedad en el México contemporáneo:nombrar lo innombrable, coordinado por M.I. García. México: Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM) , campus Estado de México.
Spitze, G.D., y J. Huber. 1980. Changing Attitudes Toward Women's Nonfamily Roles, 1938-1978. Work and Occupations 7:317-335.
Tallichet, S., y E Willits. 1986. Gender-role Attitude Change of Young Women: Influential Factors from a Panel Study. Social Psychology Quarterly 49 (3): 219-227.
Thorton. A., D. Alwin y D. Camburn. 1983. Causes and Consequences of Sex-role Attitudes and Attitude Change. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 211-227.
Tuñón-Pablos, E. 1999. Women in Mexico: A Past Unveiled. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Velasco, S. 2004. Las mujeres indígenas de México y el movimiento social por sus derechos a raíz del surgimiento del EZLN. En Mujeres y sociedad en el México contemporáneo: nombrar lo innombrable, coordinado por M. I. García. México: ITESM, campus Estado de México.
Wilson, T 2003. Forms of Male Domination and Female Subordination: Home Workers vs. Maquiladora Workers in México. Review of Radical Political Economics 35 (1): 56-72.
Open access policy
The authors who publish in región y sociedad accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the copyright laws, región y sociedad recognizes and respects the authors’ moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to the journal to disseminate the articles in open access. región y sociedad does not charge the authors for submitting and processing articles for publication.
All the texts published by región y sociedad —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons license 4.0 Attribution – Noncommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 International), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as they mention the works’ authorship and the first publication in this journal.
The authors can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in región y sociedad (for instance include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in región y sociedad.
For all the above, the author(s) must send the Letter of transfer of property rights of the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This letter can be sent by e-mail as a PDF to: region@colson.edu.mx
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
