El poder de los alcaldes en México: control partidario de los gobiernos locales y desempeño electoral, 1991-2006
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

subnational politics
mayors
electoral mobilization
democratization
generalized estimation equation models

How to Cite

El poder de los alcaldes en México: control partidario de los gobiernos locales y desempeño electoral, 1991-2006. (2013). región Y Sociedad, 25(56). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2013.56.a104

Abstract

Rising political competition and fiscal decentralization have had important consequences on subnational politics and governments in Mexico. The literature on these consequences has emphasized the growing influence of governors on local and national politics. This article contributes to the debate on the subject by highlighting a phenomenon neglected by recent literature: the power of the mayors in the electoral arena. The article proposes that partisan control of local governments affects parties' electoral performance. In order to test this hypothesis, we analyzed electoral results obtained at the municipal level by the three main parties -PAN, PRI and PRD- in all elections between 1991 and 2006 within three states that vary in terms of governing party and electoral competition. 

PDF (Spanish)

References

Ames, Barry. 1970. Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant Party. The American Political Science Review 64 (1): 153-167.

Beck, Nathaniel y Jonathan Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with Time-series Cross-section Data. The American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634-647.

Cabrero Mendoza, Enrique e Isela Orihuela Jurado. 2002. Finanzas en municipios urbanos de México. Un análisis de los nuevos retos en la gestión de haciendas locales. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos 17 (1): 175-208.

Casar, María Amparo. 2002. Executive-legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946-1997). En Legislative Politics in Latin America, compilado por Scott Morgenstern y Benito Nacif, 114-144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---------- e Ignacio Marván. 2002. Gobernar sin mayoría, México 18671997. México: Taurus-Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE).

Cornelius, Wayne A. (editor). 1999. Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California San Diego.

Cox, Gary W, y Michael C. Munger. 1989. Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections. The American Political Science Review 83 (1): 217-231.

De Remes, Alain. 2006. Democratization and Dispersion of Power: New Scenarios In Mexican Federalism. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 22 (1): 175-204.

Desposato, Scott y Francisco Cantú. 2010. The Evolving Mexican Party System. Ponencia presentada en el Encuentro Western Political Science Association.

Diaz Cayeros, Alberto. 2006. Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in Latin America. Cambridge, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Eaton, Kent. 2002. Fiscal Policy Making in the Argentine Legislature. En Legislative Politics in Latin America, compilado por Scott Morgenstern y Benito Nacif. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Estrada, Luis. 2005. Party Identification in Mexico. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de California, San Diego.

Fauvelle-Aymar, Christine y Abel François. 2006. The Impact of Closeness on Turnout: An Empirical Relation Based on a Study of a Two-round Ballot. Public Choice 127 (3/4): 469-491.

Flamand, Laura. 2006. El juego de la distribución de recursos en un sistema federal. La influencia del gobierno dividido verticalmente en la asignación de fondos federales a los estados mexicanos. Política y Gobierno 13 (2): 315-359.

Garman, Christopher, Stephan Haggard y Eliza Willis. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization. A Political Theory with Latin American Cases. World Politics 53 (2): 205-236.

Gershtenson, Joseph. 2003. Mobilization Strategies of the Democrats and Republicans, 1956-2000. Political Research Quarterly 56 (3): 293-308.

Gibson, Edward L. 2005. Boundary Control. Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries. World Politics 58 (1): 101-132.

Guardado Rodríguez, Jenny. 2009. La identidad partidista en México. Las dimensiones políticas de la competencia en las elecciones presidenciales de 2000 y 2006. Política y Gobierno, volumen temático: Elecciones en México (1): 137-175.

Hernández Rodríguez, Rogelio. 2004. El resurgimiento de los poderes locales. Estudios Sociológicos 22 (66): 773-781.

----------. 2003. The Renovation of Old Institutions: State Governors and the Political Transition in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 45 (4): 97-127.

----------. 2000. La historia moderna del PRI. Entre la autonomía y el sometimiento. Foro Internacional 40 (160): 278-306.

----------. 1991. La reforma interna y los conflictos en el PRI. Foro Internacional 32 (126): 222-249.

Hernández Vicencio, Tania y José Negrete Mata. 2001. La experiencia del PAN: diez años de gobierno en Baja California. Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte-Plaza y Valdés.

Hilgers, Tina. 2011. Clientelism and Conceptual Stretching: Differentiating Among Concepts and Among Analytical Levels. Theory and Society 40 (5): 567-588.

----------. 2008. Causes and Consequences of Political Clientelism: Mexico's PRD in Comparative Perspective. Latin American Politics and Society 50 (4): 123-153.

Hiskey, Jonathan y Damarys Canache. 2005. The Demise of One-party Politics in Mexican Municipal Elections. British Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 257-284.

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6-7): 845879.

Klesner, Joseph L. 2005. Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 47 (2): 103-142.

----------. 1993. Modernization, Economic-crisis, and Electoral Alignment in Mexico. Mexican Studies-Estudios Mexicanos 9 (2): 187-223.

Kostadinova, Tatiana y Timothy J. Power. 2007. Does Democratization Depress Participation?: Voter Turnout in the Latin American and Eastern European Transitional Democracies. Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 363-377.

Langston, Joy. 2010. Governors and "Their" Deputies: New Legislative Principals in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 235258.

----------. 1996. Why Rules Matter: The Formal Rules of Candidate Selection and Leadership in the PRI, 1978-1996. Documento de trabajo no. 58. México: CIDE.

---------- y Francisco J. Aparicio. 2008. Legislative Career Patterns in Democratic Mexico. México: CIDE.

Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional: la larga marcha, 19391994. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lujambio, Alonso (coordinador). 1996. Poder legislativo. Gobiernos divididos en la federación mexicana. México: Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública.

Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy. Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

----------, Alberto Diaz Cayeros y Federico Estévez. 2007. Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico. En Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, compilado por Herbert Kitschelt y Steven I. Wilkinson, 182-205. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Mizrahi, Yemile. 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in México. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

----------. 1995. Democracia, eficiencia y participación: los dilemas de los gobiernos de oposición en México. Política y Gobierno 2 (2): 177-205.

Molinar Horcasitas, Juan y Jeffrey A. Weldon. 1990. Elecciones de 1988 en México: crisis del autoritarismo. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 52 (4): 229-262.

Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. El votante mexicano. Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

---------- y Patricia Méndez. 2007. Party Identification in the 2000 and 2006 Presidential Elections in Mexico. Política y Gobierno 14 (1) : 43-75.

Moreno Jaimes, Carlos. 2011. Is Local Spending Responsive to the Poor? An Appraisal of Resource Allocation and Electoral Rewards in México. Politics & Policy 39 (6): 1021-1052.

Nacif, Benito. 2002. Party Discipline in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies. En Legislative Politics in Latin America, compilado por ídem., y Scott Morgenstern. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Plümper, Thomas. 2005. Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2) : 327-354.

Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: From Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview Press.

---------- y Peter M. Ward. 1995. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

Rosas, Guillermo y Joy Langston. 2011. Gubernatorial Effects on the Voting Behavior of National Legislators. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 477-493.

Schedler, Andreas. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism. The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Londres: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Sosa, José. 2002. El gobierno más cercano: percepciones ciudadanas sobre la administración pública en México. Foro Internacional XLIII (4): 809-830.

Ward, Peter M. 1998. De clientelismo a tecnocracia: cambios recientes en la gestión local municipal en México. Política y Gobierno 5 (1): 95-133.

Zorn, Christopher J. W 2001. Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications. The American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 470-490.

Open access policy

The authors who publish in región y sociedad accept the following conditions:

In accordance with the copyright laws, región y sociedad recognizes and respects the authors’ moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to the journal to disseminate the articles in open access. región y sociedad does not charge the authors for submitting and processing articles for publication.

All the texts published by región y sociedad —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons license 4.0 Attribution – Noncommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 International), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as they mention the works’ authorship and the first publication in this journal.

The authors can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in región y sociedad (for instance include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in región y sociedad.

For all the above, the author(s) must send the Letter of transfer of property rights of the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This letter can be sent by e-mail as a PDF to: region@colson.edu.mx

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.